Volume 11 | Jumada Al Oula 1444 |
Issue 1 | December 2022 |
ISSN 24102237 |
Editorial
Adoption of the New Law to Prevent Conflicts of Interest in Kuwait:
An Important Addition to the Anti-Corruption Legal System
By: Prof. Badria A. Al-Awadi
Editor-in-Chief
In another step to strengthen the rules of integrity, transparency, fortify the public office, combat corruption, and in response to the requirements of Law No. 47 of 2006 approving the United Nations Convention against Corruption, the National Assembly in Kuwait approved on December 13, 2022, the new Law No. 1 of 2023 regarding the prevention of conflicts of interest. This law replaces the old Law No. 13 of 2018 regarding the prohibition of conflicts of interest, which the Constitutional Court ruled in its session on May 1, 2019, to be unconstitutional, along with its executive regulations, due to fundamental defects in the legal formulation of its articles.
Adoption of the New Law to Prevent Conflicts of Interest in Kuwait: An Important Addition to the Anti-Corruption Legal System
Chief-in-Editor Prof. Badria A. Al-Awadi
In another step to strengthen the rules of integrity, transparency, fortify the public office, combat corruption, and in response to the requirements of Law No. 47 of 2006 approving the United Nations Convention against Corruption, the National Assembly in Kuwait approved on December 13, 2022, the new Law No. 1 of 2023 regarding the prevention of conflicts of interest. This law replaces the old Law No. 13 of 2018 regarding the prohibition of conflicts of interest, which the Constitutional Court ruled in its session on May 1, 2019, to be unconstitutional, along with its executive regulations, due to fundamental defects in the legal formulation of its articles.
In order to bypass the observations and complaints of the Constitutional Court regarding the method of drafting rulings and their controls, the new law included twenty articles, including a statement defining conflict of interest and those subject to its provisions, what is meant by the special interest, the person associated with the subject, the influential percentage, disclosure, and the whistleblower. In Article (1), the legislator sought to be more precise and specific in defining the crime of conflict of interest, as he clarified in the first paragraph that what is meant by: “conflict of interest” is that the subject or any person associated with him owns an influential percentage in any company or financial activity that has dealings with His employer and related to his job work with his knowledge of that, or his role as mediator, agent, sponsor, or consultant for any company, or private establishment whose activity is related to his work and related to his job work with his knowledge.
Then the law clarified in the same article that what is meant by “the private interest” is the material or moral interest that the subject intends to achieve for him or any of the persons related to him, as a result of the decision or action he took or participated in taking, and that “the person related to the subject is every person related to him.” The subject is related by kinship, lineage, or affinity up to the second degree, and every person for whom the subject is a custodian, guardian, or guardian, and every natural or legal person with whom the subject has a business relationship, mediation, agency, or representation, and any financial activity and any company in which the subject participates, and any of the persons who are ancestors The male influences her decisions. The law defines the effective percentage as “the number of stakes or shares whose value is not less than 5% of the capital of the financial activity or company, and this percentage is determined by the total shares or shares owned by the subject and the persons associated with him.”
The law limited those subjects to its provisions in Article Two to those subject to the provisions of the Anti-Corruption Public Authority Law, all public officials and persons entrusted with a public service, as well as workers in companies if the state or one of the public bodies or public institutions contributes in them by no less than 25% of their capital. And obligated them to disclose cases of conflict within fifteen days and to get rid of them or to step down from the position under pain of prosecution as a perpetrator of the crime. According to specialists in this field, the number of those covered by this law exceeds fourteen thousand (14,000) governmental jobs, which places a heavy burden on the inspection bodies in the presence of a crime of conflict of interest and investigation thereof, namely the Public Authority for Combating Corruption and the Public Prosecution.
In addition to the procedures to be followed by those to whom it is addressed, including employees and administrative officials, the law includes severe penalties of fines and imprisonment for the accused, and obliges convicted persons to return or confiscate the funds obtained from the crime. The law permitted the court to remove them from office, and to order the annulment of the decision or action they took or participated in taking, and the consequences thereof. The law considers the conflict-of-interest crimes stipulated in this law to be corruption crimes, in accordance with the provisions of the law regulating the Public Authority for Combating Corruption (No. 2 of 2016).
The manifestations of the strictness of the law also appear in the fact that the criminal case in the crimes stipulated in this law does not fall, nor does the sentence imposed in it fall due to the lapse of time. The law added that the penalties stipulated in this law do not prevent the imposition of any more severe punishment that is prescribed in another law.
Thus, the legal system for combating corruption in Kuwait has witnessed an important addition to the approval of this law after considering the observations of the Constitutional Court and the criminal jurisprudence. The main challenge remains in the extent to which the provisions and procedures of this system are applied in a way that achieves its philosophy and objectives in preserving public funds and preserving the public function, and thus achieving the public interest and preserving the national wealth.
Content
Arabic Studies and Research
The Legal System of the Dispute Settlement Committee in the Communications and Information Technology Regulatory Authority in the State of Kuwait: An Analytical Comparative Study
Dr. Khaled Fayez Al Huwailah
Assistant Professor of Public Law
Law Department, College of Business Studies
PAAET, State of Kuwait
& Kuwait International Law School
Possible Legal Reason as a Condition of Arrest or Search or the Issuance of their Permission in US Law
Dr. Yousef Al Mutairi
Associate Professor of Criminal Law
Department of Law, College of Business Studies
PAAET, State of Kuwait
International Responsibility for Violating Environmental Protection Rules During Armed Conflicts
Dr. Norah Abdulaziz Alhamad
Assistant Professor of Public International Law
Public Law Department, College of Law
Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, KSA
Governance of a Qatari Public Shareholding Company Listed on the Main Market: A Study in the Balance between Shareholders and Management
Prof. Amel Mamlouk
Professor of Private Law
College of Law, University of Qatar
Punitive Compensation in the Latin Legal System – Complicated Question and Confused A nswer! A Study of the French Position and an Explanation of the Egyptian and Lebanese Position
Prof. Mohammad Arfan Alkhatib
Professor of Civil Law
Law Department, Ahmad bin Mohammad
Military College, Doha, Qatar
The Relationship between Anti-Corruption Measures and the Protection of Human Rights
Prof. Nadia Cherairia
Professor of Public International Law
Faculty of Law and Political Science
Baji Mokhtar University, Annaba, Algeria
The Criminal Confrontation of Spreading False News on Social Media in the Jordanian Legislation: A Comparative Study
Dr. Muath Yahia Al-Zoubi
Assistant Professor of Criminal Law
School of Law, The University of Jordan
Dr. Mohammad Nawwaf AL-Fawareh
Associate Professor of Criminal Law
School of Law, The University of Jordan
The legal Adaptation of the Protectionist Trade War in the Era of American President Joe Biden
Dr. Taleb P. Sulaiman and Sedqi M. Eissa and Dr. Tahsin H. Samael
Assistants Professors of Private Law, Faculty of Law
and Political Science and Administration, Soran University, Iraq
Commentary on the Ruling of the Constitutional Court in Appeal No. 5 of 2021 issued on February 16, 2022, Regarding the Unconstitutionality of Criminalizing Imitation of the Opposite Sex
Dr. Ahmad Abdulatif Aljarallah
Assistant Professor of Criminal Law
Saad Al Abdullah Academy for Security Sciences
And Kuwait International Law School
Dr. Muaath Suleiman Almulla
Associate Professor of Criminal Law
& Director of the Law Diploma Program
Kuwait International Law School
Comment on Palestinian Court of Cassation Decision Civil Cassation No. 495/2015 Issued on 11/18/2019 related to Arbitrary Dismissal
Dr. Naeim Jamil Salama
Assistant Professor of Civil Law and Dean
Faculty of Law, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
Ibrahim Khaled Yahia
Lecturer and lawyer
Faculty of Law, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
English Studies and Research
Smart Contracts from the Perspective of Kuwaiti Law
Prof. Haïssam Fadlallah
Professor of Private Law
Faculty of law, Lebanese University
Filière Francophone de Droit
The Criminal Aspect of The Protection System of Refugees in The Kingdom of Bahrain
Dr. Noora M. AlShamlan
Assistant Professor of Criminal Law
& Criminal Procedure
College of Law, University of Bahrain